It Is Worse than We Thought

An impeachment inquiry is necessary for Federal District Judge Paul Engelmayer.

My initial article about the highly unusual (to put it mildly) Temporary Restraining Order entered by New York Federal Judge Paul Engelmayer blocking access to Treasury documents, showed what a rush job that Order was. That was evident because the filings by the Plaintiff States was so voluminous, and Engelmayer’s Order was entered so quickly, that it could not possibly have been the product of reasoned judicial analysis and reflection. See “More Revolution from the Insurrectionist Federal Judiciary.” It all smelled of a pre-cooked deal. The stench was so bad that it raises questions of possible corruption that must be answered.

To put this article in context for those new readers who (God forbid) may not have seen my initial article, these two paragraphs give a short overview of what this lawsuit and the temporary restraining order are all about.

The U.S. Constitution grants the sole executive power to the President. That power has now been usurped by New York’s Letitia James and 18 other insurrectionist state attorneys general,¹ all in league with one low-level federal judge in New York.

That judge has taken it upon himself to be the first judge ever to grant a temporary restraining order (“TRO”) against the President of the United States that also to forbids a cabinet secretary from accessing his own records without giving them an opportunity to respond, with zero analysis of his Constitutional authority to make such a radical ruling, zero analysis of the Federal Rule governing injunctions and temporary restraining orders, and zero analysis of why he is enabling fraud and grift by blocking access to records that show who got government money and for what.

My initial article focused on some of the procedural defects in the Plaintiff States’ request for a TRO and Engelmayer’s Order granting the TRO. I had intended to work today on a follow-up article that would address some of the substantive problems with the Order, and then lay out some battlefield strategies that could address the over-reaching lawfare that is being waged on the President, his administration and the Country.

But I have put that on temporary hold because I have now obtained new information that shows that the situation was much worse than suggested by my earlier observation that “Engelmayer’s Order was a very rushed, put-up job.” I have not seen this reported elsewhere, so please subscribe and read on. It is worse — much worse — than we knew.