Discussion about this post

User's avatar
A Cynic's avatar

John, Biden, I assume either never took Econ. 101 wherever he went to school or his memory has failed him once again. But I will say this for a man of very limited economic experience who never held down a real full time job in all of his earning years, he has amassed a pretty solid nest egg of net worth. And I understand he was a sometime college professor at my alma mater. Can anyone explain to me how he accumulated all of this wealth on a US Senators salary? Maybe he knows something we don't know.

Expand full comment
ANG Pilot's avatar

Unfortunately, the people who need to read your comments, John, will never see them and the people on this blog who do mostly agree with you anyway. The level of ignorance of basic Civics and American history among our citizenry makes it much easier for Democrats to carry out their "fundamental transformation."

The Founders, while imperfect men themselves, had a keen grasp of human nature and crafted a Constitution that at least tried to mitigate our baser instincts. Nowadays, those baser instincts have become the mother's milk of our politics. Politicians, especially those on the Left, play on people's grievances, greed, and envy; and that is the core of Biden's economic "policy" message. Hate the person who has more than you do because it's unfair. The government will make sure those with too much are punished and then redistribute their ill gotten gains to you.

An earlier generation chose to disregard the previous Constitutional prohibition against an income tax and gave us the 14th Amendment which was supposed to impose economic "fairness" but instead it gave politicians the unlimited funds to grow the government into the behemoth it is today - along with all the big government ills the Founders tried to prevent. But the principle behind the progressive income tax—the more you earn, the larger the percentage of tax you must pay—would have been appalling to the Founders. They recognized that, in James Madison’s words, “the spirit of party and faction” would prevail if Congress could tax one group of citizens and confer the benefits on another group. Unfortunately, that spirit of party and faction is what rules today. It's the basis for pretty much everything the government does.

It's hard to say where this train ends up but it sure seems like the engineers driving it are intent on speeding us down the wrong track to economic and social oblivion.

Although not quite apropos to this discussion: John Adams was right: "Our Constitution was made only for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other..." Unfortunately, we're proving him all too correct.

Expand full comment
2 more comments...

No posts