Nope, no way they are woke. Only a seriously lethal organization focused on destroying the enemy would insist that all organizations drop what they are doing and immediately purge all "stigmatizing language" from orders and policy. Phrases like "substance abuse" or "suffering from" or "threat of suicide" or "mental disease." You better come up with a vague euphemism, soldier, if you know what is good for you.
After he admitted to telling the Chinese he would warn them if Trump did anything HE wouldn't approve, I can't believe he still has a job in the military.
Nope, no way they are woke. Only a seriously lethal organization focused on destroying the enemy would insist that all organizations drop what they are doing and immediately purge all "stigmatizing language" from orders and policy. Phrases like "substance abuse" or "suffering from" or "threat of suicide" or "mental disease." You better come up with a vague euphemism, soldier, if you know what is good for you.
After he admitted to telling the Chinese he would warn them if Trump did anything HE wouldn't approve, I can't believe he still has a job in the military.
Excellent point. I did not include it only because I did not think that it fit into the wokeness category. But, it is still reprehensible.
Go John Go, Bravo Blue , fire at will, and thanks for taking out the trash from Nelson Kieff